Silo Location Options Analysis

Australia

The Problem

  • Char output was manually packed in bulk bags, moved by forklift, and loaded onto trucks
  • The initial location (Option A) could not fit the preferred, cheaper 2 silo design under the 15 m site height limit (exceeded by 386 mm).
  • Switching to a 3 silo configuration at Option A to meet height limits added $216,767 in equipment and civil costs ($765,017 total).
  • Option A suffered from site issues: heavy rain flooding, truck queuing, and blocking critical set-down/Franna crane access.
  • Traffic congestion and safety hazards existed between trucks, mobile plant, and pedestrians during shift changes.
  • Potential operational disruption and traffic jams during civil piping installation across the road.

The Solution

  • Design a pneumatic transfer system to load char directly into storage silos for direct truck loading.

  • Conducted a location study (Options A, B, and C) and evaluated a fall in ground levels toward the road.
  • Re-sited the 2-silo design to Option B, which only required $585,972 total due to minor concrete pad adjustments.
  • Moved installation to Option B along the internal asphalt road, complete with a garden bed.
  • Re-routed truck traffic away from the site’s most heavily used pedestrian crossing (office to production).
  • Staged culvert installation in sections and laid utilities before laying the new asphalt road.

The Outcome

  • Removed the bulk bagging process and eliminated manual handling.

  • Identified that ground fall at Option B/C allows the shorter 2 silo structure to comply with the height limit.
  • Absorbed the civil/installation cost of Option B within original budget contingency, saving ~$179k over Option A’s 3 silo design.
  • Avoided blocking set-down areas, re-used existing stormwater drains, and provided a potential windbreak for dust control.
  • Improved traffic flow and significantly reduced risk of vehicle/pedestrian conflicts.
  • Option B (2 silo) was formally recommended as the most cost-effective and safe solution, though the overall project was later deprioritised due to client funding constraints.

How can we help you?

Facing a technical or operational challenge?
Let's solve it together